(This banner makes me feel sooooooo much better... hated that old one since the first day I used it.)
Well, heck, that was a pretty swell episode.
I mean, really, you get one of the worst most pointless challenges in Top Chef history, you have lame and cruel antics at Judges' Table (really, Elves, just stop), and it still manages to be arguably the best of the season. At the intersection of great cooking and great television lie the best Top Chef episodes, and this was one of them.
Not everybody's happy about the non-elimination, of course, but I love it. It just felt right, even before the judges started deliberating. It's been suggested that it's the judges' job to name a worst dish and this was somehow dereliction of duty, but really... we've now had 107 episodes of Top Chef. They couldn't have a hung jury just once in there somewhere?
Speaking of which, the assumption seems to be that nobody at JT could name a worst dish. But am I the only one who wonders if it wasn't actually a hung jury? We know from previous blogs and interviews that Judges' Table works on consensus. They argue and argue and argue until they agree about who should go. Or, as we've been told, when in rare circumstances they're unable to reach consensus, three who agree can overrule the fourth. But while we haven't really seen any direct evidence to suggest it, has anybody considered the possibility that they reached individual decisions, but were deadlocked? Even if the show was all sunshine and happiness, extended JT shows they certainly weren't lacking for criticisms, nitpicky though they may have been. I just wonder -- and I stress wonder -- if this wasn't less of a kumbaya moment and more of a Twelve Angry Men moment. Just a thought.
And what the heck, let's throw out another possibility that occurred to me. Here's a chunk of Tom's talk at JT:
"But, you know, again, I don't think we knocked anything for being cold, and just about every dish was cold. So I have a hard time-- because that's why [Richard's sauce] congealed, because the dish got cold. And there was such a long, long-- it was cold outside, and there was a long travel-- it was a long trip between the kitchen and the front, so that's-- I have a hard time with, with that."
Is he stopping himself from saying that he has a hard time judging the dishes when they weren't served hot? If, due to the setup, every dish was served cold and it was beyond the contestants' control, might the judges have thought it impaired their judging ability enough that it made an elimination inappropriate? Again, just a thought. Point being, I wouldn't completely dismiss the possibility that there were some other perfectly reasonable dynamics at work here.
The other thing I find so fascinating about this episode is that it further illustrates what I think is a clear shift in judging criteria. I've touched on it earlier this season, but the judges just seem more willing to accept simpler dishes, perfectly executed than they have been in seasons past. It used to be that got you two thirds of the way through the season, and then you had to turn on some heavy creativity to push through to the finish. But contestants have been scoring with some very, very traditional flavors, and to some degree I feel like the old rules have gone out the window. Maybe it's just the food this field has been making, I don't know, but has anybody been criticized for taking the easy route when it comes to degree of difficulty this season? Has anybody been criticized for making something predictable? It really does feel like they've come to a place where it isn't about creativity, and it isn't about expressing a mature, personal style, but rather it's taste rules all, full stop. I don't mean to suggest that's necessarily good or bad. But I'm more and more convinced that it's different.
You'll note that I based the stat count for this week's EC on the order in which people were sent on or held at JT. The point, and I think it's a very good one, has been made that it really wasn't clear that the last two standing were the bottom, or that Mike was on top. Whether that reflected a true ranking or was simply a dramatic ploy is unknown. But it seems probable to me that it wasn't completely arbitrary, and these numbers are sometimes judgment calls anyway, so that's how I'm going to score it. Also, we'd already reached the point of the season where I struggle for new things to say about the contestants, but we've had nearly TWO full seasons with these guys rather than the customary one, we've tacked on another episode, and we didn't even get rid of anybody since the last one. So forgive me if some of this is a little redundant.
The power rankings are not purely a prediction of who is most likely to win, or an assessment of last episode's dishes, or a reflection of the contestants' historical performance, but rather a nebulous amalgam of all three, combined with a little bit of gut feeling, to provide a relative measure of current awesomeness.
| 1 |
Antonia |
|
Quickfires |
1 |
4 |
2 |
| Last Week: 2 |
|
Eliminations |
2 |
7 |
4 |
Weeeeeeeell, maybe not entirely redundant. Yeah, it's time. Two things put Antonia over the top for me this week. First was that, if you give her credit for last week's technical (but entirely legitimate) disqualification, she's been on top of nine straight challenges. My notes start in season four, and the closest I can find to that is a streak of six from Kevin Gillespie. I mean, this is really remarkable on its own, but then add to that the fact that we just saw a challenge where the last five standing in the all-star season were supposedly all kicking ass at the same time, and she walked away with the win. If those two things in tandem don't merit the top spot, I'm not sure what does. And if you want the rankings to be a little more predictive, the shift in judging that I mentioned above only works in Antonia's favor. I couldn't deny her the top spot this week even if I wanted to.
|
| 2 |
Richard |
|
Quickfires |
3 |
7 |
1 |
| Last Week: 1 |
|
Eliminations |
3 |
6 |
1 |
Which isn't to say that Richard is far behind. We haven't seen Tom's bowled over look a whole lot this season, but that was it. That was the kind of giddy, energized response that the Voltaggi and Pork Jesus were able to coax out of him. As some have pointed out, Richard seems to be his own worst enemy at this point, but if he makes a few more dishes like that, this should be a very exciting finals. (Sea beans over braised short ribs? Really? Wow.)
|
| 3 |
Carla |
|
Quickfires |
1 |
3 |
4 |
| Last Week: 3 |
|
Eliminations |
3 |
6 |
4 |
I will say that if not for the uncertainty surrounding the EC dishes' relative merits, I might again consider flipping Mike and Carla. But for lack of a clear bottom, I need to take at face value that the dishes were nearly equally awesome, and we'll just say that Carla seems to have purged the demons that plagued her in the previous episode. Nice to see her solidify her position going into the finals. And nice to finally put a face to Matthew as well!
|
| 4 |
Mike |
|
Quickfires |
2 |
4 |
4 |
| Last Week: 4 |
|
Eliminations |
0 |
4 |
2 |
Anybody else starting to wonder if Mikey might actually make a go of it in the finals? That's an awful lot of praise over the past couple of episodes, and now he has a chance to reload and throw everything he has at two or three episodes. I don't think he's the best chef here, but as we've been discussing, this is a game, and he's played it pretty well. Now he has a seat at the finals table, and he just might do something with it.
|
| 5 |
Tiffany |
|
Quickfires |
0 |
0 |
6 |
| Last Week: 5 |
|
Eliminations |
0 |
3 |
7 |
Wow. Talk about picking the perfect time to bring your best. Tiffany's been limping through the entire season, and at the precise moment when anything other than a Grade A top notch dish would have sent her home, she found it. I think you have to give her at best an outside chance at making the finale. But then again, as we've been saying, she's one of the two who have been running back-to-back seasons, and she's running on fumes. Might a little time off before the finals allow her to come back with the kind of run she showed in the second half of last season? Seems unlikely, but you have to wonder if she might come back from the break a different chef.
|
WARNING : MINOR EPISODE THIRTEEN SPOILERS AHEAD
So what the heck happens now?
It looks like we're getting three more episodes. So is it a straight single elimination, single elimination, three chef finale? You'd think so, but there are also hints towards another non-elimination... sort of... maybe. Bottom line, at this point it's anyone's guess.
I doubt the quickfire is going to be much more than an exhibition. Sure, some cash will be handed out and perhaps some advantage will be conferred upon the winner, but I doubt it's anything more than an opportunity to bring back more old faces. And I'm particularly excited to see Stephanie because, let's face it, she's kind of awesome.
The elimination looks pretty straightforward, cooking upscale food for Bahamian royalty. Just the kind of thing we like to see in the finals.
Here come the new hairdos... discuss!
Comments